WINE COUNTRY: Supervisors adjust, then approve, community plan

A blueprint for an ambitious Temecula-area winery expansion was tentatively approved Tuesday, Dec. 3, by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors — but it is expected to be challenged in court.

The 19,000-acre Temecula Valley Wine Country Community Plan was adopted 4-0, with Supervisor Marion Ashley absent. Final adoption is anticipated Dec. 17.

“I just think this is so critical to the county and its economic viability,” Supervisor John Tavaglione said.

The plan was approved without a controversial equestrian trail component that angered ....

Read Full Article on Press Enterprise Website

Lawsuit threatened over Wine Country plan

As Riverside County’s ambitious blueprint for Temecula Valley winery expansion nears completion, there remains a threat the plan will get bogged down in litigation.

That threat rose Wednesday, Nov. 6, during a Riverside County Planning Commission hearing on the Temecula Valley Wine Country Community Plan. Vintner Ray Falkner warned his Protect Wine Country group will sue if the county leaves intact a proposed “doughnut hole” to carve out and exempt a church from the plan, so it can expand.

Read Full Article on Press Enterprise Website

Group Wins Suit Against County

By Dave Downey, North County Times / Californian, January 24, 2012

Full Article Newspaper Site Here

A judge has sided with a Wine Country group challenging Riverside County's decision to give broad power to its planning director to consider projects not permitted in the vineyard area, and to let private schools open in all areas of the unincorporated county.

Riverside Superior Court Judge Gloria Connor Trask's tentative ruling, to be made final next month, appears to torpedo Calvary Chapel's bid for a major church expansion and new school on Rancho California Road.

The church earlier tried unsuccessfully to get the county to add houses of worship to its list of acceptable land uses in Wine Country. It later applied for permission to expand after the Board of Supervisors quietly approved an ordinance in November 2010 giving authority to the planning director to process projects not on the list, but deemed "substantially the same in character and intensity."


The group, Protect Wine Country, sued in May 2011.

Read more: Group Wins Suit Against County

Judge’s ruling pleases church expansion opponents

By Jeff Horseman, Press-Enterprise, January 25, 2012

Full Press Enterprise Article Here

A judge has ruled in favor of plaintiffs who sued Riverside County alleging that a 2010 ordinance could ruin Temecula Valley Wine Country by allowing inappropriate land uses.

Protect Wine Country, an alliance of residents, wineries and others, alleged the ordinance allowed the county planner too much leeway to approve projects that normally would not be allowed in places like Wine Country. The law passed without a public hearing and failed to comply with the state Environmental Quality Act, they argued.

Read more: Judge’s ruling pleases church expansion opponents

Law affecting Wine Country prompts lawsuit against county

Press Enterprise by Jeff Horseman, May 14, 2011

A group representing Temecula Valley Wine Country landowners has sued Riverside County, alleging a recently passed ordinance threatens the region's rural ambiance.

Protect Wine Country filed the suit May 6 in Riverside County Superior Court. The suit describes the plaintiffs as an informal group who live and own land in the agricultural areas of the county and Temecula.

The county Board of Supervisors is set to discuss the suit behind closed doors Tuesday. The county's administrative offices were closed Friday.

The suit concerns an ordinance the board passed in November. According to the suit, the ordinance allows the county planning director to approve uses not allowed in a particular zone if those uses are essentially the same as the permitted ones.

The plaintiffs are concerned that the ordinance gives the planning director more discretion to approve projects that normally would not be allowed in places like wine country, which they believe could potentially ruin its ambiance.

The ordinance has an unjustified exemption from scrutiny under the California Environmental Quality Act, the suit alleges, adding the new law could allow uses that run contrary to county rules protecting Wine Country agriculture.

The county also failed to hold a public hearing on the ordinance, the suit alleges. It asks the court to nullify the ordinance and require the county to follow state environmental rules should supervisors take up the ordinance again.

Protect Wine Country attorney Ray Johnson is a Temecula-area environmental attorney known for his opposition to the proposed Liberty Quarry project. He also represented a citizens' group that successfully sought a revised environmental study for what would be Temecula's first hospital.

Johnson said Protect Wine Country is concerned about what the ordinance could do to a region known for vineyards, wineries and a generally rural atmosphere.

Calvary Chapel Bible Fellowship's expansion plans and the addition of sports fields to the Galway Downs equestrian center are examples of potentially incompatible uses in Wine Country, he said. He added those projects could leave less traffic capacity for wine-making uses on Rancho California Road, Wine Country's main thoroughfare.

The suit comes as the county works on a master plan for Wine Country. As it's written now, the Wine Country Community Plan would merge the region with the neighboring Valle de los Caballos area and create separate zones for residents, wineries and equestrian ventures.

The plan is meant to balance residents' interests with the desire to turn Wine Country into a world-class wine region. Critics worry the draft plan could lead to too many wineries or repressive restrictions.